Friday Inspiration – Making It Work

For as long as I can remember, I never felt like I completely fit in. I was never a total outcast, mind you. I even had popular friends. On occasion, I got invited to the “cool kid” parties. I had friends who were jocks, cheerleaders, academics, drama geeks, and honestly, even teachers.

But I rarely felt like I belonged.

When I was younger I wanted everyone to like me. EVERYONE. My parents, teachers, peers, complete strangers; it is entirely possible that I appeared to have multiple personalities at the time. You like hockey? Federov is the man! You find pop music detestable? Let me burn my Boyz II Men CD*.

It was an exhausting existence.

Not that it was all bad. I learned that I did in fact enjoy hockey. I exposed myself to new things I wouldn’t have otherwise and came to love them. Some things faded, like using lots of hair product and makeup, but others became parts of who I am.

Now, as an adult, there are very few people with whom I am truly at ease and completely myself. I say “as an adult”, as if adulthood changes things, but honestly people still behave very much like they did in high school. There are still cliques. There are still the people who think they are the “cool kids”. There are still people that make me feel like an outsider, no matter how much of an effort I make to be a friend.

The difference is I don’t try nearly as hard to be a person they want to accept.

Don’t get me wrong. I still try new things and try to be accommodating to others tastes and preferences as I get to know them. I’m a people pleaser and was raised to think of the needs of others. But I now know that street shouldn’t be one way. If I am the only one making an effort, than it may be best to move on.

Since I started writing (well, since I started writing publicly, not just in my own little cave) I’ve been able to enjoy meeting others who enjoy the things that I do, who “get” me. I’ve even met those who may be very different than me, but supportive and caring nonetheless. But I’ve also met the same cliquey folks who may as well still be in high school.

The good thing is that I don’t feel like I have to please the high school folk anymore.

This lesson is one that I try to apply specifically to my writing as I put more of myself out there. For a long time, I didn’t do anything more than write stories for myself (or the occasional email exchange with a coworker composed entirely of haiku). I’ve done a solid job of amusing myself, friends, and even a colleague or two (or more).

Every time I hit the publish button, every time I send another page of my novel to my writing partners, I get a knot in my stomach. Will they like it? Will I be accepted? Will I be one of the cool kids?

In the end, no matter how much my stomach knots, acceptance doesn’t matter. In the writing world there are still cliques. There are still people that befriend you that have no real interest in being your friend. There are people that will give their opinion who don’t actually care about you or your work. Somebody is going to roll their eyes and ignore my work.

But someone else will like it. And someone else will even love my work.

And that work is me. It’s not me trying to fit some image of what someone else thinks my writing should be.

Don’t get me wrong. Critique is fine. That’s why I have writing partners. They tell me when something absolutely doesn’t work. They tell me when something raises an eyebrow (not in a good way), and occasionally they tell me when I’ve made a choice they wouldn’t have made. But then they let it lie in my hands. I take everything they say to heart, but I make the decision in the end, not to please them, but to make the work better.

And to make the work who I am.

Amidst the endless (really, have you seen all the links on Twitter? Endless) advice on what you must and never do when you write, it can be easy to change our writing to fit what we think is expected of us. It is easy to force ourselves to fit in.

Some changes can benefit us. (Seriously, hockey is pretty awesome.) But if we change everything, our writing ceases to be our art. It just becomes a copy of everything else out there.

I don’t know about you, but I don’t want every book I read to be from the same author, even the ones I adore.

In the end, you have to learn to make it work. For your writing. For you.

*Burn, like with fire, not make a copy. Also, I did not destroy the sweet harmonies of Boyz II Men. To the end of the road, indeed.

~~~~

Here are a couple links I loved this week. Go. Read ‘em. Then Sunday, get your butt out of the house and watch the solar eclipse.

From Yuri Baranovsky, my hands down favorite post this week, 9 Problems of Being an Artist. If you only click one link in this post, make that the one. (And if you haven’t checked out Leap Year yet, go get familiar with Yuri’s work. Talent, he has it.)

Serial fiction has become a recent interest, one in which I delved with no actual research, so I found this post really interesting, and oddly encouraging: Why Your Serial Fiction Is Likely To Fail And What You Can Do About It

On the whole TIME magazine, breastfeeding/parenting debate/debacle hullabaloo, an amusing male perspective on breastfeeding: From Breasts to Boobs and Back Again

Summertime is “up ons” us. Here is my plan for looking good when it gets here. An oldie, but a goodie.

For your general amusement, have any of you been watching The Daly Show? (That is not a typo.) Check out this one, guest starring Nathan Fillion. And if you were a Wings fan, you must view this and this.

Annnnd…if you are going to heed my advice on checking out the eclipse, check out this article to find out where and when to see it. Sadly, being in Stinktown, USA (a.k.a. Florida) means I won’t get to see it, so I expect pictures, people.

Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday – A Guide

My TV watching buddy and I came to a realization recently. Why It’s Worth a Watch has been going strong for quite some time. With so many posts under our belts, we thought now would be a good time to give you a full recap of what shows will be satisfying your entertainment appetite, and which dishes you should pass on.

Going from the worst to best choices, here are the shows I’ve reviewed. Be sure to check out Tiffany’s list for a full guide of what’s worth watching. First off, a quick recap of the Watchwed rating system:

GTV (Gourmet TV): Everything we want and more
MacTV (MacNCheese TV): Guilty pleasure. Not perfect, but is satisfies
JFTV (Junk food TV): It’s not great for us, but we’ll go back for seconds
SSTV (Still Simmering TV): It has potential, but the jury is still out
NIV (Nyquil Induced Viewing): Perfect for that late night television sleep timer
LOTV (Liver&Onions TV): Do we really have to explain? Blech

I’ve only had to suffer through one Liver and Onions worthy show, Hawthorne. Thankfully, the show was not renewed for another season, so unless you run into it in syndication, it will be easy to avoid this awful dish.

I was a bit surprised that I only have one awful review, but don’t get too excited. This is less of a sign of better TV shows as it is my reluctance to give anyone a truly awful review, and Tiffany’s reluctance to make me watch something I already think I’m going to hate.

Which probably explains why I came up with Nyquil Induced Viewing. There are a few shows that fall in the “only when under the influence and trapped in bed” category. Sadly, both shows feature a female lead. Hollywood, please, I beg of you, write more quality roles for women. I know you can do it. The Protector and Body of Proof definitely are not evidence of that. (Incidentally, The Protector was not renewed for a second season. Body of Proof has been, but struggles in the ratings.)

When I’m looking for empty calories, my Junk Food TV shows were Chloe King on ABC Family and Harry’s Law. Being that I never returned to watching The Nine Lives of Chloe King, it was junk food that didn’t really grab my sweet tooth. This treat was discontinued (cancelled) in September, but others must still be looking for it, as ABC Family is in talks for a movie version. Harry’s Law sits in the DVR queue for weeks at a time and only gets a watch if there is nothing else around to satisfy my TV craving, but last I heard the network ordered six more episodes, so it’s still safe in the candy drawer.

Going back through the reviews, I noticed that one solitary show was sitting on the back burner still. Necessary Roughness caught my eye initially with Craig Bierko involved, but episodes without him didn’t hold my interest. It wasn’t bad, so it at least deserves to be tossed in the back of my junk drawer for later.

Now, judging by the amount of shows that fall in the MacTV and GTV rating categories, I love TV more than I care to admit.

While I haven’t watched the latest season, my very first #watchwed post fell between Junk Food and MacTV viewing, an impressive feat for a show on a network I never watched previous to this series. Switched at Birth, while predictable, was easy to watch drama on ABC Family. In the same category, a show I enjoy (but don’t get too upset if I miss) is Royal Pains, a light medical drama on USA. Also a simple, enjoyable watch.

Although blessed with a huge budget and substantial names backing it, Terra Nova only garnered a MacTV rating upon additional review. And that’s mostly because I kind of dig dinosaurs. I’m more excited about another newcomer, Falling Skies, set to return in the summer, as well as Once Upon a Time, a fairy tale based series created by the fellows that brought you Lost. Despite having somewhat favorable #watchwed ratings, sci-fi and fantasy shows don’t have a great track record lately, even popular ones, as I discovered when I went to review Eureka. We’ll see if Terra Nova or Falling Skies can break the trend.

That's the fear of cancellation in their eyes.

Comedy sitcoms have been pretty surprising this past year. With ratings ranging from the questionable macaroni salad that is Community to the gourmet mac that is Parks and Recreation, there seems to be something for everyone. Newcomers Suburgatory and New Girl have both been pleasant surprises, shows that I look forward to and even rewatch.

A Mac rated show I haven’t kept up with, but perhaps should, is Covert Affairs. With the soon to be absence of Chuck on my TV (::moment of silence: :) I could use something to fill the gap, and this just might be the right show. For now.

Pourin' a 40...

My favorite of my MacTV shows has to be Person of Interest. Great action, premise, and actors. I really look forward to settling in for this one, living up to its Gourmet MacTV rating.

So, what were my favorites of the “Why It’s Worth a Watch…” series thus far?

Initially, my Gourmet rating bore the kiss of death. Men of a Certain Age, a well written and acted drama, was too slow for the TV watching majority and didn’t survive. House, a show that I admit is probably MacTV viewing for most by now, but still held a special place with me, is also being considered for cancellation.

But the success of some of my other GTV shows gives me hope. The Mentalist continues to move forward with the Red John storyline, but in a way that keeps me interested. The Good Wife and Mad Men are proof that strong female leads can be written on TV (they have more female writers than most shows…take a hint TV). Castle continues to keep me and many others entertained, particularly with its winks and nods to loyal fans with inside jokes and Firefly references.

And Nathan Fillion, of course.

But more than all of them, the fanciest most gourmet meal on my plate goes to:

I just swoon.

Downton Abbey. Season two began last week and I am once more swooning over everything about this show. Originally a “Queue It Up!” selection in our series, it’s back on PBS in full swing and should not be missed. If you watch nothing else, watch this show. It is, without a doubt, absolutely delicious.

WATCH IT NOW!

Ahem.

If that’s not enough for you, Tiffany and I each gave a couple of our Netflix queue favorites in addition to our regular reviews. On my list was Law and Order: Criminal IntentSherlock, and of course, Firefly.

We’ve got more new shows coming, so many more reviews to come! What shows already in progress need to be in our list? What new shows are you looking forward to? 

Thank you to all of our readers for your continued support of the Why It’s Worth a Watch series. If you aren’t chatting with us about your favorites on Twitter, come find us using the #watchwed tag.


Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday – Popularity Contest

With the hustle and bustle that comes with the end of the year, Tiffany and I decided it would be wise to follow the lead of the major networks and air some reruns this week and next.

Which #watchwed received the most hits? Well, despite the fact that House, M.D. brings the most people to the blog via Google search terms, that review isn’t number #1.

It should be of no surprise that the show that came out on top features a writer in the lead role…so without further adieu:

Are you excited?

No?

You should be.  Every time I mention a certain someone on this blog, the visits climb and the ladies swoon.

Ok, maybe it’s just me swooning, but the part about the visits is an undeniable fact.  I have charts and graphs.

With another week of telling you all about our favorite fall shows on Why It’s Worth a Watch, I get to tell you about a show I kinda sorta love.  I’ll tell you right now, I’m giving it a GTV.  Like any gourmet dish, it may hold the same appeal for everyone, but I’ll just say if you don’t love it, you have bad taste.  (I kid, I kid.)

Castle, rolling into its fourth season on September 19th on ABC, follows the story of Richard Castle (Nathan Fillion), a mystery novelist.  Yes, writerly friends, it is a show about a writer. [insert cheering here] Having killed off the main character in his successful mystery series, he finds new inspiration by using his connections to shadow an NYPD detective.

Detective Kate Beckett (Stana Katic) is the intelligent, no-nonsense officer he chooses to follow and use as the model for his new series, Nikki Heat.  While she is reluctant about having a writer shadow her, even annoyed, over time she does recognize the value of having the out of the box thinking of a writer around.

Along with Beckett, Castle spends his time with her fellow detectives, Javier Esposito (Jon Huertas) and Kevin Ryan (Seamus Dever).  The pair is much more accepting of Castle’s presence, as it does bring certain advantages, like fancy espresso makers and rubbing shoulders with famous people.

In addition to the writer’s relationships with the detectives, his at home life includes his live-in mom (Susan Sullivan), an (out of work) actress, and his bright and very mature teenage daughter (Molly Quinn).

Now, obviously, the storyline will involve a lot of murders that need to be solved, including the mystery around the death of Detective Beckett’s mother.  It’s not like we don’t have a million crime/mystery dramas out there.  So what’s the big deal about this one?

Watching it unfold with a writer’s overactive imagination chiming in adds an entertaining and often humorous element.  It’s all about the story.  The fact that the writer is played by Nathan Fillion, who does charming and funny better than most definitely contributes to the success of the show.

Castle has a little bit of everything; the humor, drama, and possible romance between Castle and Beckett, the banter of Esposito and Ryan, and one of the most adorable father/daughter relationships on TV.

In addition to a great show, the novels Castle writes in the show can be found at your local book store.  Heat Wave and Naked Heat have both been on the New York Times Best Seller List, and Heat Rises is due for release later this month.

AND, you all know how much I love shows with geeky references.  Nathan Fillion gets the opportunity to send a little something to his faithful Firefly fans.  If you aren’t already watching, I won’t spoil them for you.  But I will include one here:

While the mysteries in Castle aren’t always as mysterious as I might want them to be, I love everything about the show enough to not care.  If you aren’t watching, check it out.

Are you a Castle fan?  Do your reasons extend beyond an appreciation for Nathan Fillion?  Have any of you read the books released in line with the show?  Do you appreciate humor in your crime/mysteries?

Now head over to Tiffany’s blog to see what post ranked number one on her list.

Tune in the next week when we’ll continue our reruns. Don’t worry, the new year will bring new articles with it. Don’t change that channel.

A Recap of The WatchWed Review System:
GTV (Gourmet TV): Everything we want and more
MacTV (MacNCheese TV): Guilty pleasure. Not perfect, but is satisfies
JFTV (Junk food TV): It’s not great for us, but we’ll go back for seconds
SSTV (Still Simmering TV): It has potential, but the jury is still out
NIV (Nyquil Induced Viewing): Perfect for that late night television sleep timer
LOTV (Liver&Onions TV): Do we really have to explain? Blech

Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday – Castle

This week Tiffany and I go head to head with Monday night rivals!

Are you excited?

No?

You should be.  Every time I mention a certain someone on this blog, the visits climb and the ladies swoon.

Ok, maybe it’s just me swooning, but the part about the visits is an undeniable fact.  I have charts and graphs.

With another week of telling you all about our favorite fall shows on Why It’s Worth a Watch, I get to tell you about a show I kinda sorta love.  I’ll tell you right now, I’m giving it a GTV.  Like any gourmet dish, it may hold the same appeal for everyone, but I’ll just say if you don’t love it, you have bad taste.  (I kid, I kid.)

Castle, rolling into its fourth season on September 19th on ABC, follows the story of Richard Castle (Nathan Fillion), a mystery novelist.  Yes, writerly friends, it is a show about a writer. [insert cheering here] Having killed off the main character in his successful mystery series, he finds new inspiration by using his connections to shadow an NYPD detective.

Detective Kate Beckett (Stana Katic) is the intelligent, no-nonsense officer he chooses to follow and use as the model for his new series, Nikki Heat.  While she is reluctant about having a writer shadow her, even annoyed, over time she does recognize the value of having the out of the box thinking of a writer around.

Along with Beckett, Castle spends his time with her fellow detectives, Javier Esposito (Jon Huertas) and Kevin Ryan (Seamus Dever).  The pair is much more accepting of Castle’s presence, as it does bring certain advantages, like fancy espresso makers and rubbing shoulders with famous people.

In addition to the writer’s relationships with the detectives, his at home life includes his live-in mom (Susan Sullivan), an (out of work) actress, and his bright and very mature teenage daughter (Molly Quinn).

Now, obviously, the storyline will involve a lot of murders that need to be solved, including the mystery around the death of Detective Beckett’s mother.  It’s not like we don’t have a million crime/mystery dramas out there.  So what’s the big deal about this one?

Watching it unfold with a writer’s overactive imagination chiming in adds an entertaining and often humorous element.  It’s all about the story.  The fact that the writer is played by Nathan Fillion, who does charming and funny better than most definitely contributes to the success of the show.

Castle has a little bit of everything; the humor, drama, and possible romance between Castle and Beckett, the banter of Esposito and Ryan, and one of the most adorable father/daughter relationships on TV.

In addition to a great show, the novels Castle writes in the show can be found at your local book store.  Heat Wave and Naked Heat have both been on the New York Times Best Seller List, and Heat Rises is due for release later this month.

AND, you all know how much I love shows with geeky references.  Nathan Fillion gets the opportunity to send a little something to his faithful Firefly fans.  If you aren’t already watching, I won’t spoil them for you.  But I will include one here:

While the mysteries in Castle aren’t always as mysterious as I might want them to be, I love everything about the show enough to not care.  If you aren’t watching, check it out.

Are you a Castle fan?  Do your reasons extend beyond an appreciation for Nathan Fillion?  Have any of you read the books released in line with the show?  Do you appreciate humor in your crime/mysteries?

Now head over to Tiffany’s blog where she tells us whether or not Hawaii Five-O is worth a watch.

Tune in the next week for CBS hit shows, The Mentalist and Blue Bloods.  And as always, be sure to let us know what shows you are looking forward to in the comments.

 

A Recap of The WatchWed Review System:
GTV (Gourmet TV): Everything we want and more
MacTV (MacNCheese TV): Guilty pleasure. Not perfect, but is satisfies
JFTV (Junk food TV): It’s not great for us, but we’ll go back for seconds
SSTV (Still Simmering TV): It has potential, but the jury is still out
NIV (Nyquil Induced Viewing): Perfect for that late night television sleep timer
LOTV (Liver&Onions TV): Do we really have to explain? Blech

Thursday Tweets – #Hashtaggin’!

It’s Thursday, so I feel the need to blog about something that starts with “T”.

I probably should be blogging about something that starts with “Th”, but that limits me greatly, and I don’t really have the know how to write a solid post entitled “The Thursday Theremin”.

Maybe another Thursday...

(Although seriously, that thing is pretty awesome. Just sayin’)

So, how about Twitter? I mean, after all, there are a lot of people navigating the waters of social media, and I did take the time to talk about Google+.

Why not talk Tweets?

I should preempt this with the warning that I have no plans of making this a regular thing.  Nor will I have a Facebook Friday. And a MySpace Monday? Please. I wouldn’t have had one of those if it was 10 years ago. Ick.

But Twitter is the choice of businesses and celebs alike. And I have to admit, as neither of those things, I still find it pretty useful. Of all the social media platforms out there I’ve found Twitter the most useful for expanding my network.

When I first started using it, quite some time ago, I didn’t see the appeal right away. After all, for a verbose person like myself, why not use Facebook where I can say what I want and not be limited to 140 characters?

Twitter is great when you know how to use it. If you plan on using it, the first thing I recommend is using an app like TweetDeck. (Check out posts like this one on how to get the most out of TD – this blogger has more than one post on the topic, so look feel free to browse when you get there.)

The piece that I was missing at the beginning that made a world of difference for me?

Hashtags.

When you are on Twitter, you’ll notice users doing things like this:

I wrote a post about #bacon. Check it out. {link} #baconlovers #ameating #pigsaremagical

I talk pork at #baconsuitsaresexy

If you are wondering what the deal is with all those # (hashtags), these tags enable Tweeps (Twitter People) to follow certain topics. If I love bacon, I might have a column in Tweetdeck where I follow #bacon. Or, I might be a part of a group that discusses the virtues of every porcine piece at #pigsaremagical. If you tweet a message using those tags, anyone following the tag will see it, even if they don’t follow you.

If what you tweeted using those tags is of particular interest to those watching the tags, they might even take the leap and start following you personally.

Cool, right?

Well, before you start adding every tag imaginable to your post, some caveats.

He follows me. In a non-creepy way.

One of the things I enjoy about Twitter is how public it is. If I want to follow the swoonworthy @NathanFillion, I can. He doesn’t have to accept me as friend, I just follow him. If I am especially fortunate, someone I adore and follow might follow me back (thanks, Craig Bierko). Same idea tends to go with tags. You can use tags as you see fit. No one is stopping you from following or using a given hashtag.

BUT, some tags are used more like a specific group chat than a social hangout. Know your tags before you use them. If a tag is used primarily for chatting and you attempt to use it to spread a link to your blog or a cause you want to promote, you could unintentionally upset the users of the tag.

This goes for retweeting, too. Pay attention to the tags on a tweet. If you aren’t familiar with them, either get familiar or take them off. It may seem silly, but some tags have rules, and it doesn’t behoove you to upset the regulars.

Tweetiquette is important. Prevents angry mobs.

For your own benefit and those you are retweeting, spread the link love around to different tags. Whether you are promoting your own blog post, or the post of a fellow blogger, if everyone tweets the same link to the same tag in the same span of 30 minutes, guess what? The same people see the link. Over and over. A few times is emphasis. More than that is annoying. Don’t keep retweeting with the same hashtag.

What if you really adore someone’s link, but aren’t familiar with very many tags? Favorite the tweet to save it for later.  Keeping it in your favorites makes it easy to return to it and broadcast another time.  A different time of day, or a different day entirely will bring a new audience to your fellow bloggers link. You’ll be doing them a favor, and keeping one tweet from cluttering up a particular tag. Once you’ve retweeted, you can always unfavorite (or keep it there if you really love it).

Of course, hashtags don’t have to just be about networkingt. Sometimes, they can just be for fun. Some are used for games, like #replacebooktitleswithbacon. If I tweet “Gone with the Bacon” followed by that tag, anyone playing along can see my contribution.

You can also use them on a smaller scale to add humor to your tweets. There are varying opinions on that, but being that I am one of those people that use them that way, I say go for it. Others might enjoy the tag enough to start using it themselves.

Like #tweetjack. (The act of jumping in on a conversation between two people)

And now, I’m off. All this talk of bacon and hash has me craving some breakfast.

Just getting started and need a quick shot of the basics?  Check out this post.  

Want to know more about making your Twitter life easier? Have questions? Leave them in the comments, or send me a Tweet at @amberwest. I don’t guarantee I have the answers, but I will at least attempt to be entertaining.

Blackbird has the right idea...

Why It’s Worth a Watch Wednesday – Queue it Up!

This week, Tiffany and I take a break from our usual TV watching to recommend shows you may have missed. Many TV watchers out there are taking advantage of Netflix’ streaming option, so we thought we would share some of our favorites to throw in your queue.

My first pick: Firefly.

The cast, not in costume. Eye candy for all!

I have to confess. I am a Browncoat. That’s right. This show has such a following that the fans have their own cool nickname. And why shouldn’t we?

Firefly is set in the future, the year 2517 to be precise, and the primary setting of the series is the ship “Serenity” named after a key battle that the Independents lost to the Alliance. The “Serenity” is a firefly-class ship, named for it’s resemblance to a firefly.

Lots of fan art out there...

The show itself blends some visuals you wouldn’t expect. The inner planets, those strongly influenced by the central government (The Alliance) are high tech, with strong Asian influence. The outer planets, less bothered by the government, but lacking in the comforts of the inner planets, resemble the Wild West.

The juxtaposition of elements like spaceships flying over herds of horses, while strange in theory, blend together to make an original show worthy of catching your interest.

And then there are the characters, which we all know are my favorite part of any show worth watching.

We may experience some slight turbulence and then - explode

What would a ship be without a captain? Captain Mal (Nathan Fillion, Castle) is a man of some mystery. While his crew takes some less than honest jobs, he is a man of integrity and moral character, with a fierce loyalty to his ship and crew. He was a Sargent in the war, fighting for the Independents (or Browncoats), which is why he finds himself living on the outskirts of society. He leads a crew full of strong personalities, so while he is a great leader, he doesn’t win every argument he partakes in.

Lookin' for a fight...

Adam Baldwin (Chuck) plays Jayne Cobb, the ships muscle. Or guy with grenades. Whatever the occasion, he is ready to fight, sometimes too ready, and isn’t always the brightest. The beauty of his character is that he doesn’t think before he speaks, which on occasion means voicing what everyone else is thinking. It is entirely possible that he isn’t as dumb as he seems.

I am a leaf on the wind

The ship’s pilot, Wash (Alan Tudyk) tends to offer comic relief in even the most stressful situations, and is one of the more sensitive men on the ship, having learned to be a pilot to see the stars. He tries to show his tougher side in one of my favorite episodes “War Stories” when he insists on accompanying Mal on a mission, driven by jealousy of Zoe and Mal’s history as war compatriots.

What I really dig (that’s right, I said dig) about this show are the strong female characters. Zoe (Gina Torres, Suits) is Wash’s wife, but was Captain Mal’s war buddy long before that, having served under him as a coporal. She is strong, a fighter, stoic in the face of horrible circumstances, and adores her husband. How many women on TV are depicted that way?

Then there’s Inara (Morena Baccarin, V) a “companion” who rents a shuttle from the ship, so becomes a part of their crew. She is the equivalent of a courtesan, a position that is looked on with respect by most people, Mal not being one of them. She is educated and independent, and she provides some romantic tension in the show (not to mention brings out Mal’s softer side from time to time).

Kaylee (Jewel Staite, Warehouse 13) is the ship’s mechanic. She is the sweetest character, who has a gift for mechanics, and loves everyone on the ship without reservation. She is the least mysterious character, which makes her that much more likable. She is what she is and you love her for it. (Also, the actress Jewel Staite has a great food blog. Unrelated, but highly recommend it.)

Not original members of the crew, but still very important to the story are the doctor, Simon Tam (Sean Mahrer, Warehouse 13) and his troubled sister, River Tam (Summer Glau, Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles, Dollhouse) who are seeking refuge on the ship, as the young doctor rescued his sister from the Alliance, who have done something to her that he can’t quite figure out. (I’m not telling. Go watch it.) The ship even gets itself a preacher, Shepherd Book (Ron Glass), who’s mysteries we never fully get the opportunity to unravel.

Joss Whedon writes killer dialogue. It’s smart and sharp. It is true banter. Not just two people speaking too quickly for anyone to keep up. (Although you may want to brush up on your Mandarin. Just sayin’.)

And yet, this show, when it aired back in 2002 got the axe before they could even finish the first season. The good news is that if you watch the whole season (including the unaired episodes) and want more, a movie was later released – “Serenity” – that may make you feel a little better.

But only a little.

I’m supposed to tell you my favorite episodes here, but to be honest, I can watch this series start to finish over and over, I love every bit of it.

“Our Mrs. Reynolds” and “Trash” are two episodes with guest star, Christina Hendricks (of Mad Men fame) that are particularly good.

While Sci-Fi, this show has an appeal that goes beyond geek. The cast is talented (and easy on the eyes), the writing is unique, the visuals are interesting; I wish there were still shows like this being made.

As I wait for that to happen, I will continue to stream my beloved Firefly. A GTV (GourmetTV) all the way friends. A nice rare steak with Singapore Noodles on the side.

Shiny.

Are you a browncoat? If not, are you considering adding this one to your queue?

Now head over and see what our TV expert has in her queue. Next week, we bring more Netflix desirables to clutter up your weekends and take you through your laundry piles.

Who’s Your Leading Man?

I promised a follow up post to last week’s “Who Would Play You?” with a post discussing your leading man.

In keeping with the way last week’s post began, I stuck the hubs face into the lookalike generator at MyHeritage.com.  I held my breath as I waited for it to tell me that my leading man would be that guy who plays Andy in “The Office”.

Instead it returned the following:

"Not a lot of people know that."

First up, Michael Caine.  (That’s Sir Michael Caine to you.)  Despite the hubs lack of a smooth accent and distinct cadence, there are some simliarites.  For example, neither of these men use their given birth name.  I guess “Maurice Joseph Micklewhite” didn’t have that Hollywood ring to it.  (You should really talk to Benedict Cumberbatch.  He seems to be making it work…)

And how can you go wrong with an actor that has been nominated every decade from the 60s to 00s?  He’s worked with everyone from Noel Coward to The Muppets.  Unfortunately, with that vast experience comes age.  While the hubs is older than me, Sir Caine is still a few too many years away from even Diane Lane.

"I object."

Next up, Gerard Butler.  He does have the hubs eyes, is only a year his junior, and has the slightly crooked smile that seems to show up whenever a camera is present.

But the similarities end there.  As much as I love his Scottish accent, if I am going to be that inaccurate just to listen to him speak, I’ll go with Dougray Scott instead.

I did find it interesting that he was in a rock band while studying to be a lawyer.  Which makes him perfect to play my cousin’s man.

There you are.

The last pick, well, we can stop comparing.  Since many of you last week found Marisa Tomei to be a suitable pick in the role of me (despite never showing up in the MyHeritage search), I think you will appreciate bringing these two together again.  Who didn’t love them in “Only You”?  If we can have an encore of Meg Ryan and Tom Hanks, why not these two?

And, because I know you all are wondering, let me introduce you to the actual hubs.

Ok, he's not THAT old.

Here he is.  In a 1956 yearbook photo.  I couldn’t resist.  Those aren’t his ears.  Or hair.  But the face is all him.

Aww.

So what do you think?  Sir Caine, Gerard, or RDJ?  Who plays the leading man in your movie?

(You all totally thought I was just going to say Nathan Fillion and call this post done, didn’t you?)

Currently Listening to: Jonas pronounce his “s” like Sean Connery.  Maybe he is trying to tell me who he wants to star in the movie.

Ed. I forgot to note that I do have male readers, so feel free to comment with your leading lady, boys.

Is Technology Making You Mean?

For the small handful of readers here that know me personally, you will be familiar with today’s post.

Since most of you are not among that small group, I’ve decided to do a “reprint” of an article I wrote for Sloane Magazine.  I handled the Rant column in each issue.  This one seemed particularly appropriate with my increased use of Twitter.

Old readers, I’ve added a few comments (in italics).  New readers, enjoy!

~~~~~~

I’m a fan of technology, particularly its application to communication. I spend more time on my phone answering emails, texting, and updating my Facebook status then making phone calls.  (the Facebook part is no longer true…replace that with Twitter and you’ll have it right)

I get the majority of my news online and keep up with the latest through Twitter updates.  I’ve even been known to tweet, albeit occasional and somewhat mundane. (“Eating spaghetti. Yum.”)   (My tweets are slightly more interesting now.  Slightly.)

This very article is being formulated on my iPhone in the middle of a sleepless night.

Despite my affinity for the instant gratification technology provides, I am beginning to fear that the same technology is making us forget basic manners.  In short, it’s making us mean.

This struck me upon reading an actor’s tweet recently, blocking a woman because of what she tweeted to him.  The gist of the post, in all CAPS, was that the actor should stop assaulting the public with the show he currently stars in. (for those who don’t know him by the image, the actor is @NathanFillion.  Also, really? You don’t know him?)

Nathan Fillion

Well, that wasn't very nice.

When the actor responded by blocking the offending tweeter, she was surprised that he would be so sensitive.

But was he really being sensitive?  Or was he just responding the way anyone would to an unkind remark?  The woman felt she was just humorously stating her opinion. What’s the harm in that?  After all, there are people out there that are known for doing that and that alone.  (I’m looking at you Perez Hilton.  Except for the humorous part.)

So let’s think about it.

When you choose to communicate via social media, email, or text using all CAPS, the assumption is that you are yelling.  That, or you are my Aunt Clara.  Since Auntie isn’t on Twitter, it can be assumed that this person was yelling AT the actor that their current work is awful.  His reaction was to virtually walk away.

Somehow I doubt that if this woman was ever face to face with the actor she would yell in his face that she hates his show.  But this is precisely what she did.  Why the difference?

Generally, we keep uncomplimentary opinions to ourselves when there is a person standing right there in front of us.  That’s because we would be face to face with the consequences of our statement.  The fallen face of the person we’ve insulted.  Or a punch in the throat.  Whichever result, the fear of consequence keeps us in check.

Technology has given us the ability to ignore the consequences.  We are able to dehumanize the people behind the usernames and avatars, celebrity or otherwise.  Sitting behind our computers and iPhones all the time, we dehumanize ourselves as well.  Not having to see or feel the fallout of our actions means there is no sting to our conscience reminding us to be kind.  To be human.

Now, I won’t give the impression that I’ve never been guilty of such meanness. (If you trip, do I not laugh?) I am part of the generation of snark.  A large part of my education was ensconced in sarcasm and witty repartee.  But that is what worries me.  When did our remarks, often in the name of wit and humor, spill over into a total disregard for other people?  Shouldn’t there be a line somewhere?

It’s a free country.  Even if such a line existed, that freedom dictates that anyone can choose to cross it if he/she chooses.

Maybe it’s naïveté on my part to believe there is still a good percentage of the population that doesn’t go screaming their unsolicited opinions in other people’s faces.  Maybe it’s even more naïve to believe that maybe, just maybe, those percentages could carry over into our status updates, tweets, and blogs.

And maybe you are tweeting about me right now.  About my ridiculous rant and lack of talent.  And that’s ok.

All I ask is that you think of the consequences you don’t see.  And be prepared for a punch in the throat.

throat punch

Google, bringing like minded throat punchers together.

Currently Listening to: Electron John by Worm is Green